 |
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| ICP? maybe? you look like an ICP kinda person |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| besides that fact that its retarded. its really bad work go back to your artist and get your money back |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| mmmmmmm NICE. The detail work is good its a good size and nice placement |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| damn im blind again, stop doing that you nasty ppl |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| put it away, please, brb gonna be sick |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| you need to take another pic close up on the tats themselfs so i can see the detail work, but other then that. very nice |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| bad work, bad tat, just wrong, dont go to jail |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| WRONG WRONG WRONG |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| what every one else said, be original not lame like that |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| Im getting no where near that, why would you want to give ppl nightmares about your pussy |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| nice detail work |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| what jen said |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| WOOOOOHHOOOOOOOO im not nat lmao |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| PAAAIIIIIINNNNNNNN. good colors though |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| Too much going on |
