| Yahoo! Answers |
|
|
|
|
| Open Question: How bad does my tattoo look? |
|
It's a home tattoo, (big mistake)
I just wanted to know if i over criticize it or it's really shit.
I have others professionally done, this one's getting fixed soon. I just want honest opinions fro |
| 2013-08-03T06:22:44+0000 |
|
| Open Question: How bad does my tattoo look? |
|
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=izua37&s=5
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2w562vr&s=5
And in my Avi are the only ones where I can find a decent looking shot of it.
It says with hope comes faith, |
| 2013-08-03T06:18:04+0000 |
|
|
![]() |
Comments made by Shads
<-back next->
106 to 120 of 162 comments
 |
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| very nice |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| wrong again. ive seen too mamny ppl with that tat. cant any of you be original |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| wikkid wings, you got a good artist doing that sh1t |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| the blue flames arent bad, but you should have stopped there |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| You wear it well, nice work |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| i dont even want to know why, thats no im not going to ask cause i dont want to know, What if your kids see that pic!?! |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| i'm blind now, in both eyes for nine days, why thats wrong and that all i can say cause my brain is shutting down that pic gave me an epileptic seizure |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| that tat needs work |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| wash the tat off, and while your at it wash the rest of ya |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| your either a redneck, a biker, or a trucker |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| everything about that pic is just sad |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| thats just wrong get that covered up |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| you went with black and grey and RED??? why mix the worlds of color an black an grey, now it just looks out of place |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| NOt bad at all, you need a closer pic of it though so the detail work can be seen |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
 |
| that is horrible, yes the colors are ok, but from the outline on its bad bad bad, get it fixed |
<-back next->
|
![]() |
|
