| Yahoo! News |
| How to recreate body art, Coachella-style |
| Among the style statements inspiring Coachella envy across the web this past weekend were some of the particularly amazing body tattoos and makeup on show. From the whimsical to the geometric, face an |
| 2015-04-14T16:30:06+0000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Celebrity tattoos and the danger of regret |
| What are these illustrated exhibitionists thinking? Lena Dunham’s body is a human canvas, scrawled with seven big and small tattoos, making her resemble a zaftig prison inmate. With an estimated... |
| 2015-04-13T06:22:42+0000 |
|
|
![]() |
Comments made by coopersangel
<-back next->
16 to 30 of 63 comments
 |
coopersangel |
2004-11-03 |
 |
| whoa, at first i thought it was an odd looking moose. but i see the fairy now. i like it. |
|
coopersangel |
2004-09-24 |
 |
| zero tattoo deserve zero ratings |
|
coopersangel |
2004-09-24 |
 |
| i like the colors, but it looks like you took two completely diff butterflys and mixed the bodies. |
|
coopersangel |
2004-09-24 |
 |
| i think it looks good, you may want to to get the lines touched up though. its only a suggestion |
|
coopersangel |
2004-09-23 |
 |
| why are walking around in your underwear |
|
coopersangel |
2004-09-10 |
 |
| i like my patriotic butterfly better. mine actually took more than fifteen minutes to do. |
|
coopersangel |
2004-09-09 |
 |
| very cool. i love it and the color |
|
coopersangel |
2004-09-08 |
 |
| you should tattoo "button" right underneath |
|
coopersangel |
2004-09-08 |
 |
| i love how the colors of our flag are the only colors. |
|
coopersangel |
2004-09-08 |
 |
| AHHHHHHHHH! |
|
coopersangel |
2004-09-08 |
 |
| God Bless America |
|
coopersangel |
2004-09-08 |
 |
| let me be the first to say : EWWWWW! |
|
coopersangel |
2004-09-08 |
 |
| is it really crooked? or is it just the way he's standing |
|
coopersangel |
2004-09-01 |
 |
| i have an american flag one too you should check it out |
|
coopersangel |
2004-08-13 |
 |
| i was gonna get a similar tattoo. then i found a more origional one that i like better. its looks good though. |
<-back next->
|
![]() |
|
