 |
XXXTATTOO |
2012-05-21 |
SO I TAKE IT YOU DIDNT WANT A LARGE COCK DEAD CENTER ON YOUR BACK...NO? |
 |
RefuseResist |
2012-03-18 |
The "artist" that did this should be shot |
 |
beth |
2009-06-08 |
the er 'shadow' behind it makes it look silly. and you shouldve left the penis in. and the square and circle around him. |
 |
micke |
2009-02-28 |
You should never attempt imitate one already existent masterpiece... |
 |
Rachelle |
2008-02-28 |
I actually like this piece, and am thinking of doing one myself, but a much smaller one... having the artist draw it up for me, and maybe change him, to a her? Don't know if that's one of those "you just shouldn't do it" idea's, but, I like the idea... |
 |
tom264 |
2007-05-18 |
Coulda bin great, shoulda bin great, but it missed... |
 |
lindsay |
2007-02-04 |
I just doesn't look right, i wouldn't be bothered with the math, i'd be more concerned with the art and how it looks. |
 |
Bob |
2006-11-20 |
It looks pretty stupid without the penis. Everyone knows it's in the original so leaving it out draws way more attention to it than if you had just put it in. This really looks nothing like the Vitruvian Man. |
 |
Binx |
2006-02-13 |
legs look stumpy |
 |
herrhepcat |
2005-09-27 |
kellene is completely wrong. The tattoo matches exactly the proportions of the original. Half the point of it is the math behind the picture using golden rectangles. As for the lack of a cock, once again, the point is the math. Go get your flash tatt. |
 |
8-Ball |
2005-09-13 |
I agree, how could you censor one of the best know artitst to ever live?
For that your tattoo rates a 1.
Unbelievable |
 |
Rachael |
2005-08-29 |
i can see what you were going for..... |
 |
Dream0n83 |
2005-06-14 |
yeah dude...go big or go home. |
 |
jordan |
2005-05-18 |
you censored and cropped a timeless piece of fine art, you must really suck as a human. |
 |
woenellie |
2005-05-03 |
i agree w/ kellene. did you look into artist's portpholio's before you got this done? |