| Welcome guest. Sign In | New User Sign Up | Post Picture | Gallery |
Ink pics
|
Follow @rmipost 
|
 |
sophie | 2009-04-14 |
| Very nice!
I love staffs have one myself There amazing dogs I think these are very well done A lot of detail and the shading is very good 10 |
||
 |
Jeffers | 2008-08-24 |
| more comments on dogs than tattoos! nice detail in there I think they look good. | ||
 |
tdahl | 2007-12-04 |
| I got this information from the Dog Encylopedia, developed by the ack. Pretending you know anything about the history of Bully Breeds is pathetic. I know your need to prove everybody that you are a better person can't be ignored, but please save it. | ||
|
tdahl | 2007-12-04 |
| The akc is a pointless organization. The pitbull was developed after the now extinct original Bull Dog in the UK that was bred to fight. The Bull Dog and Stafordshire were bred to create the Pit Bull which was indeed bred for fighting. But not the Staffie. | ||
 |
Ironhed | 2007-12-04 |
| these staff's were no longer bred for gameness and fighting ability. other regestries came about once akc dropped the pitbull. | ||
|
Ironhed | 2007-12-04 |
| only after fighting was made illegal did the breed suffer by not being bred to the standard of which they had been for 300 yrs. akc did not want the dark cloud of fighting held over them so they took 100 dogs and started the am staff line. | ||
|
Ironhed | 2007-12-04 |
| pitbulls were bred for the sole purpose of bloodsport nothing more nothing less. I do know the history you need to read up some. they took the best bulldogs and bred with the best terriers and created a bull and terrier later to be known as pitbull. | ||
|
tdahl | 2007-12-04 |
| Staffies were bread to bait bulls. Not to fight. They helped farmers in the UK to castrate bulls. They made sure their owners were not trampled. Any one that would continue to portray any bully breed as viscious is an ignorant moron. This tat is a waste. | ||
|
Gemz | 2007-10-29 |
| wow very nice!! | ||
 |
Jason | 2007-06-16 |
| Fantastic looking Staff's BUT, I think I'd have prefered to see two slightly different heads for a back peice rather than a mirror image, seems like just a bit of a lost opportunity, but great work.. | ||
 |
kclayne | 2007-02-03 |
| Great tattoo....but IRONHED, you may ought to do your homework a little better as to what the dog was originally bred for....and give them props for that.....not for fighting | ||
|
Ironhed | 2006-12-15 |
| I have a similar tattoo, nice detail. dogfighting is the history of the breed and wether you are for or against doing it in present day you have to honor the dog for the purpose in which it was bred for. | ||
| Signup | Login | Home | Gallery | Search | User Profiles | Help | About | Links |
| Privacy | TOU | Site Map | Contact |
| © 2014 ratemyink.com |