 |
amer |
2009-11-07 |
| nice rack |
 |
noheiarchy |
2009-02-14 |
| BAD BAD BAD |
|
heather2 |
2009-02-04 |
| patrice...what r u talking about she need's to get them removed not covered up...ewwwww |
|
Tim&Tresa@InkWorx |
2008-11-02 |
| are those tits or ass crack,none the less shitty tats |
 |
jim |
2008-11-01 |
| SLOPPY TITS WITH SHITTY TATS |
 |
Patrice |
2008-09-23 |
| it can always be covered...hopefully |
 |
PFC Burns |
2008-08-08 |
| these are pitiful i bet they were like 20 dollers a piece the least u could have done is save the 40 dollers and use it for one better tat maybe the ink wouldnt have faded |
 |
LadyHavoc |
2008-05-27 |
| this is tasteless crap, get a decent chest piece and cover it up |
|
mr&mrs smith! |
2008-05-09 |
| pure trash |
|
amyanubis |
2008-04-27 |
| Shit, you may aswell have been scarred for life. |
 |
AMANDA |
2008-03-19 |
| DUMB,DUMB,DUMB! WHAT A WASTE OF INK. |
|
Kathrine |
2007-12-11 |
| I agree. faded and ugly |
 |
Brian |
2007-11-05 |
| DAM! What size are those puppies??? |
 |
razzanojohn |
2007-08-31 |
| is that your tits or an ass!?! and why are those snake thingy's all wrapped up like that, wierd butt i'll give it a ten, inks ink |
 |
John |
2007-08-18 |
| faded and ugly. what a waste of ink, money and space |
