| Yahoo! Answers |
|
|
|
|
| Open Question: How bad does my tattoo look? |
|
It's a home tattoo, (big mistake)
I just wanted to know if i over criticize it or it's really shit.
I have others professionally done, this one's getting fixed soon. I just want honest opinions fro |
| 2013-08-03T06:22:44+0000 |
|
| Open Question: How bad does my tattoo look? |
|
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=izua37&s=5
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2w562vr&s=5
And in my Avi are the only ones where I can find a decent looking shot of it.
It says with hope comes faith, |
| 2013-08-03T06:18:04+0000 |
|
|
![]() |
<-back next->
1 to 15 of 34 comments
 |
drahc888 |
2008-02-01 |
i say
durt. |
 |
Pukie |
2007-08-02 |
| Why?? |
|
Destiny |
2005-05-07 |
| okay...the lettering sucks and isn't even...and your own name...that's dick |
|
dana |
2005-04-19 |
| can I borrow that? please say no... |
 |
InkSlave666 |
2005-03-02 |
| im not gonna be as mean as most ...but one, getting your own name is ridiculous ...what are you gonna forget in a half an hour? and 2 if you ARE gonna get your name, WHHHYYYYY OOLLDDDD EENNGGLLIISSSHHH?!?!?!?!?! |
|
Elvenking |
2004-08-18 |
| is it not done? if it is I feel sorry for you. |
|
Jeremy Costilow |
2004-06-05 |
| ..If the artist is good enough, bright colors can be used to cover black so dont settle.. |
|
Jeremy Costilow |
2004-06-05 |
| Goes from big on the left to smaller on the right..... get a cover up |
|
Leanna |
2004-05-24 |
| incase you forget your name? |
|
ben_77 |
2004-04-09 |
| shit tat , nice pants |
|
heylo |
2004-03-27 |
| i think it would look nicer with colour added to the tips |
|
bocefus |
2004-03-19 |
| Courtney, you're lame and this broad is lame. why you need your OWN name on you? gonna forget who you are? retards, both of ya |
 |
Sarah |
2004-03-08 |
| nice, but i dont think the shading looks that good =/ |
 |
jennifer <3 |
2004-02-26 |
| looks like your artist got lazy, or maybe they were drunk |
|
shygirl7908 |
2004-02-01 |
| Yeah, maybe some red or something at the top. Kinda looks like it's missing something. But overall, not bad. |
<-back next->
|
![]() |
|
