| Yahoo! News |
| How to recreate body art, Coachella-style |
| Among the style statements inspiring Coachella envy across the web this past weekend were some of the particularly amazing body tattoos and makeup on show. From the whimsical to the geometric, face an |
| 2015-04-14T16:30:06+0000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Celebrity tattoos and the danger of regret |
| What are these illustrated exhibitionists thinking? Lena Dunham’s body is a human canvas, scrawled with seven big and small tattoos, making her resemble a zaftig prison inmate. With an estimated... |
| 2015-04-13T06:22:42+0000 |
|
|
![]() |
<-back next->
1 to 15 of 26 comments
 |
Jess1587 |
2008-07-16 |
| What really stands out to me is the coloring in the vine and leaves. It blends together really well. |
 |
Larnie |
2007-08-28 |
| The pastel colours look very interesting, I really like it. |
 |
BJensen |
2007-07-06 |
| Like the colors, but I think the pink flower could have a little more depth to it. |
 |
*Giggles* |
2006-09-06 |
| I am lovin the pink...Great tat |
|
paintedprincess |
2006-07-08 |
| lovely use of colour. |
 |
md22 |
2006-01-06 |
| love the color! |
|
LAuRen:) |
2005-09-15 |
| I LOVE IT GREAT COLORS AND NICE PLACEMENT:) |
 |
CRYN_OUT |
2005-06-08 |
| I want a tattoo like that, except more intricate with more little flowers. Good tatt though. |
 |
Meghan |
2005-05-31 |
| It almost looks fake, the color is nice and the lack of a black lining is pretty cool.. Not my kind of tattoo, but decent nonetheless.. |
|
rdh1079 |
2005-03-04 |
| i would like to see convulsive puppets super unique tats, oh wait, you dont have any posted. i rate it an 8, its cool |
|
lizz |
2005-02-06 |
| I like the work and detail! i have some work like that on me, very colorful,awesome! |
|
ashley |
2004-10-29 |
| pretty!!! |
|
bow chicka bow bow |
2004-09-12 |
| looks like it came out of a easter coloring book...but its nice |
 |
squarejane |
2004-08-25 |
| i love that you ditched the black outline. makes it more unique. |
|
Convulsive Puppet |
2004-07-14 |
| It's okay, but that is way too common. |
<-back next->
|
![]() |
|
