| Yahoo! News |
| How to recreate body art, Coachella-style |
| Among the style statements inspiring Coachella envy across the web this past weekend were some of the particularly amazing body tattoos and makeup on show. From the whimsical to the geometric, face an |
| 2015-04-14T16:30:06+0000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Celebrity tattoos and the danger of regret |
| What are these illustrated exhibitionists thinking? Lena Dunham’s body is a human canvas, scrawled with seven big and small tattoos, making her resemble a zaftig prison inmate. With an estimated... |
| 2015-04-13T06:22:42+0000 |
|
|
![]() |
<-back next->
16 to 30 of 33 comments
 |
painted bob |
2005-04-06 |
| ha ha ..sucks to be you ..and to think you wasted your time and money on that..give a 5 year old some markers and let them fix that mess |
|
matt |
2005-02-22 |
| no shads, the bottom needs to get finished yet and alittle greywash in the girls. Nice dragon!! looks good, but pic is alittle blurry! |
|
Shads |
2005-02-21 |
| is it done yet? and 101proof does your name got anything to do with wild turkey? love that drink lmao |
 |
101PROOF |
2005-01-28 |
| LOOKS LIKE YOU PAID 109 BUCKS TOO MUCH!!SUCKER!!!THATS WHAT YOU GET FOR GOING TO DISCOUNT TATTOO WORLD!! LOL |
|
La Nena Boricua |
2004-12-23 |
| Thats hott! |
|
Robin |
2004-12-18 |
| Don't look as good as the colored one by "Olivia." Needs work. |
|
bill |
2004-12-16 |
| looking cool dude!!!! |
|
evilseahorse |
2004-12-14 |
| Its worth every penny. |
|
KristyBug |
2004-12-09 |
| I like it... I think once it's finished it will be gorgeous |
|
pebbles |
2004-11-18 |
| can you get your money back? |
|
aesylm |
2004-09-28 |
| STFU I like it :3 |
 |
Luc05Kay06 |
2004-09-14 |
| i don't like it. the idea or the work. was the original sketch bad, or just the artist? |
|
Hayzie |
2004-09-10 |
I like it.
The Angels wings look too heavy though. |
|
daphne |
2004-07-24 |
| I like everything except the angels' wings. |
|
m0nkeybrains |
2004-05-17 |
| matt, from all the shit you talk about other people's tattoo, your tattoo is absolutely horrendous. |
<-back next->
|
![]() |
|
