Yahoo! News |
How to recreate body art, Coachella-style |
Among the style statements inspiring Coachella envy across the web this past weekend were some of the particularly amazing body tattoos and makeup on show. From the whimsical to the geometric, face an |
2015-04-14T16:30:06+0000 |
|
|
|
Celebrity tattoos and the danger of regret |
What are these illustrated exhibitionists thinking? Lena Dunham’s body is a human canvas, scrawled with seven big and small tattoos, making her resemble a zaftig prison inmate. With an estimated... |
2015-04-13T06:22:42+0000 |
|
|
![]() |
<-back next->
1 to 15 of 23 comments
 |
inks babe |
2012-03-20 |
im from k town my self and i most say one of the best tats ive seen bill put out :) |
 |
Vixey |
2010-11-21 |
This is stunning. Prefer the angel on the left to the right - but still, beautiful tattoo - High score from me! |
 |
PixieKitten |
2009-03-20 |
VERY meaningful and so beauiful! |
 |
C-A-M |
2008-07-02 |
that is one of the most beautiful tattoos ever...10+++ |
 |
Stephanie |
2008-03-25 |
so sweet congrads on both of ur little angel. very meaningful love it!!!!!!!!!
10in my books hun |
 |
LaCasualty:. |
2007-10-15 |
beautiful work |
 |
janine |
2007-09-05 |
tatto's are ment to be personal and yours deffo is..... from the heart! |
 |
Dotti |
2007-06-13 |
this is one of the best tats ive seen ever! i love it! -10- |
 |
April |
2007-05-15 |
DUDE!! My name is April May too! The tat is super rad!! 10+ for the ink and cool names! :P |
 |
Tony |
2006-12-22 |
fantastic |
 |
ilovetink |
2006-12-02 |
I love them! They are both beautiful. I think you should have the first one brightened up so they stand the test of time together! |
 |
AISHA |
2006-10-26 |
Gorgeous angels! |
 |
quilla and talesha |
2006-10-18 |
give it a 10 |
 |
Ducksgomoo |
2006-06-24 |
i think that is so pretty. and the fact its bout ur daughters. 10 |
 |
Eric |
2006-04-05 |
I definitely like the theme and tatto, maybe it would be a good idea to have the one on the right touched up a little though, because the other side looks much crisper right now. |
<-back next->
|
![]() |
|