| Yahoo! News |
| How to recreate body art, Coachella-style |
| Among the style statements inspiring Coachella envy across the web this past weekend were some of the particularly amazing body tattoos and makeup on show. From the whimsical to the geometric, face an |
| 2015-04-14T16:30:06+0000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Celebrity tattoos and the danger of regret |
| What are these illustrated exhibitionists thinking? Lena Dunham’s body is a human canvas, scrawled with seven big and small tattoos, making her resemble a zaftig prison inmate. With an estimated... |
| 2015-04-13T06:22:42+0000 |
|
|
![]() |
<-back next->
1 to 15 of 159 comments
 |
Steven |
2013-02-28 |
| I like it. |
 |
julie |
2012-03-05 |
| I LOVE IT!! greatest ive seen yet |
 |
Matt Morris |
2012-02-24 |
| very nice color work, solid tattoo |
 |
mochaskinnedECS |
2011-10-14 |
| Wow that looks great. Really clean work. |
|
chris |
2011-09-17 |
| that is lookn phat.would like to see it finnished. |
|
armadillo1343 |
2010-03-22 |
| I think the star in the middle of it is a little out of place. but it is well done work but the star ruins it for me |
|
armadillo1343 |
2010-03-22 |
| I think the star in the middle of it is a little out of place. but it is well done work but the star ruins it for me |
|
Paj |
2010-02-15 |
| not my type of tat usually to be honest, but I can still appreciate good work. and good work it is. |
|
MiniBitch43 |
2009-09-26 |
| I fucking love it. What I don't love however is the fact that people are so jealous of your AWESOME tattoo that they have to post negative comments saying that they're fake or something equally as stupid. Great work, Love the fact that they are connected! |
|
Ren |
2009-04-11 |
| MWAAAHHHH |
 |
Mikev0gel |
2009-04-03 |
| Have not seen to many this style, great work! |
 |
noheiarchy |
2009-03-05 |
| Yep i like it. Nice all the way around. |
 |
Bill |
2008-12-01 |
| I think it looks Amazing! Nice skin too! The picture is crisp clear! What kinda camera? |
 |
jim |
2008-11-01 |
| CROOKED |
|
Rob |
2008-10-17 |
| very nice work. Looks great. |
<-back next->
|
![]() |
|
