Yahoo! News |
How to recreate body art, Coachella-style |
Among the style statements inspiring Coachella envy across the web this past weekend were some of the particularly amazing body tattoos and makeup on show. From the whimsical to the geometric, face an |
2015-04-14T16:30:06+0000 |
|
|
|
Celebrity tattoos and the danger of regret |
What are these illustrated exhibitionists thinking? Lena Dunham’s body is a human canvas, scrawled with seven big and small tattoos, making her resemble a zaftig prison inmate. With an estimated... |
2015-04-13T06:22:42+0000 |
|
|
![]() |
<-back next->
1 to 15 of 22 comments
 |
Jason |
2007-07-05 |
Yep, I'll pass on the ass and the sweat rash..
BUT, in a world of boring Panther tat's, I actually quite like this one, it's different.. |
 |
Phoenixflames |
2006-08-15 |
the works ok but god is he there to keep your ass hairs in check |
 |
LeiZero |
2006-07-23 |
why?! why!? oh my god!!! go to the hospital for that shit! |
 |
Vanessa |
2006-03-16 |
that is one hairy ass |
 |
eatmyass |
2006-02-17 |
is he scratching your ass |
 |
RiseWhiteDevil |
2006-01-22 |
Great work, could have done without seeing this dude's hairy ass.. Feel sorry for the artist. |
 |
Larren |
2005-05-25 |
Well if this were rate my tattoo position i would say your at the bottom, but as for the quality of work, its great , really nice. |
 |
skippy |
2005-01-27 |
yeah good |
 |
psycho bunny |
2004-11-22 |
I like the tattoo, but think about placement. It looks like he's digging up some poo. |
 |
bigpetespc |
2004-08-26 |
Bit sad that everyone is looking at the Gents Ass and not at the tattoo...I like it. Nice work, position ??? well.... |
 |
roy perry |
2004-08-02 |
i like the panther |
 |
munick |
2004-06-20 |
why dont people on this website keep up with there body hair i mean shit man |
 |
doghouse |
2004-04-23 |
At least you will never have to look at it. |
 |
good by rate my ink |
2004-01-21 |
sooooooo brutal |
 |
scarfaze |
2004-01-11 |
Nice work good use of muscle structure for an already boring tattoo but the ink work is good |
<-back next->
|
![]() |
|