| Yahoo! News |
| How to recreate body art, Coachella-style |
| Among the style statements inspiring Coachella envy across the web this past weekend were some of the particularly amazing body tattoos and makeup on show. From the whimsical to the geometric, face an |
| 2015-04-14T16:30:06+0000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Celebrity tattoos and the danger of regret |
| What are these illustrated exhibitionists thinking? Lena Dunham’s body is a human canvas, scrawled with seven big and small tattoos, making her resemble a zaftig prison inmate. With an estimated... |
| 2015-04-13T06:22:42+0000 |
|
|
![]() |
<-back next->
1 to 15 of 23 comments
 |
Angelo |
2009-04-14 |
| sick! |
|
BJensen |
2007-06-25 |
| The script sucks but the figure is very well done........ |
 |
b* |
2006-12-06 |
| that looks cool as man he looks like a cross between an angel and BJJ fighter FREAKIN AWSOME |
|
angelpuff1017 |
2005-08-11 |
| not incredibly enthused with the whole demon/angel winged thingie.it could have been worked on a little bit more, and although with certain tattoos less is more,this one needs less shading and more detail focused on the either the wings or the figure. |
|
bighead |
2005-05-06 |
| I agree with daphne the picture is completely awesome but the letters need something then it will be better good job though |
|
cherish |
2005-04-16 |
| it looks great..9 from me |
|
me |
2004-09-14 |
| woof woof cemeterygrrl |
|
Hayzie |
2004-09-10 |
| very cool |
|
cemeterygrrl |
2004-09-08 |
| tool vs. metallica...i dont like it unoriginal |
|
daphne |
2004-07-24 |
| You need to touch up the letters. Other than that, it's a great tat! |
|
Syphon Virus |
2004-07-05 |
| Nice ink. However, when you get something that big, you need to double up on the thickness on the letters. Very nice though. |
 |
Brittany |
2004-05-15 |
| BAD ASS |
|
Kaos |
2004-05-13 |
| damn. i love it. |
|
SATXArtist |
2004-05-11 |
| horrible dude if ur gonna get somethnig that big plz have ur artist take his time!!! and the font is baaaaaaaad |
|
43 |
2004-03-14 |
| Maybe he should have put more time into it |
<-back next->
|
![]() |
|
