| Yahoo! News |
| How to recreate body art, Coachella-style |
| Among the style statements inspiring Coachella envy across the web this past weekend were some of the particularly amazing body tattoos and makeup on show. From the whimsical to the geometric, face an |
| 2015-04-14T16:30:06+0000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Celebrity tattoos and the danger of regret |
| What are these illustrated exhibitionists thinking? Lena Dunham’s body is a human canvas, scrawled with seven big and small tattoos, making her resemble a zaftig prison inmate. With an estimated... |
| 2015-04-13T06:22:42+0000 |
|
|
![]() |
Comments made by Cubs.Rule
<-back next->
1 to 15 of 26 comments
 |
Cubs.Rule |
2009-08-29 |
 |
| Not something I would get, but the work is clean. Notice how Jim (aka queer shit) doesn't have any posted pictures? Heavy on opinion, light on ink. |
|
Cubs.Rule |
2009-06-21 |
 |
| Looks real, from a distance. Nice tat. |
|
Cubs.Rule |
2009-06-21 |
 |
| You're in good hands with....Elmo. |
|
Cubs.Rule |
2009-06-21 |
 |
| Nice detail. Did the cop take the picture? lol. |
|
Cubs.Rule |
2009-06-21 |
 |
| Stunning colors & great detail. 10's. |
|
Cubs.Rule |
2009-06-21 |
 |
| OMG, your belt matches my tattoo and your tat matches my belt. How freakin' weird. |
|
Cubs.Rule |
2009-06-20 |
 |
| Nice tat. How long did it take? |
|
Cubs.Rule |
2009-06-20 |
 |
| It's a little too busy, but I really like the skull. |
|
Cubs.Rule |
2009-06-20 |
 |
| Are those 2 toasters chasing each other? I hate burnt toast. |
|
Cubs.Rule |
2009-06-20 |
 |
| Not a fan of tramp stamps and the nose is a little weak, but it's very imaginative. |
|
Cubs.Rule |
2009-06-20 |
 |
| Nice. I love the colors. |
|
Cubs.Rule |
2009-06-20 |
 |
| Very Ozzie Osbourne-ish. Nice color. |
|
Cubs.Rule |
2009-06-20 |
 |
| I'm not into devil stuff at all, but the lines are very crisp & clean. |
|
Cubs.Rule |
2009-06-20 |
 |
| Nice work, not overdone like some. |
|
Cubs.Rule |
2009-06-20 |
 |
| I think I like it, but if you post another picture that allows us to see it from a little further back, I think it will be better. Nice detail though. |
<-back next->
|
![]() |
|
