|
sproogle77 |
2009-08-09 |
|
This is astonishingly bad. How could anyone get the proportions so wrong? The size of one foot compared with the other, the tiny hand, the massive thighs, the misshapen breasts, etc. etc. REALLY bad. |
|
sproogle77 |
2009-07-28 |
|
There are probably serious cultural reasons why you should not have that. Aside from that, it is just really badly done. So uneven and clumsy looking. Wow. |
|
sproogle77 |
2009-07-23 |
|
Dickhead |
|
sproogle77 |
2009-05-10 |
|
Top part is quite mis-shaped and needs a touch up. Could be quite good with the right artist. |
|
sproogle77 |
2009-05-10 |
|
Touch up to brighten the colours, some coloured shading to brighten, maybe a feature (bird, butterfly, whatever works for you) |
|
sproogle77 |
2009-05-10 |
|
Of all the tattoos I've seen on this site, this is one of my favourites. Lots of colour, meaning, form, nice execution, great placement (and no skulls, demons or tribal). 10/10 |
|
sproogle77 |
2009-05-08 |
|
It's not a case of 'don't click on the thumbnail'. When randomly clicking through pictures, you hit 'next' and you get the full size pic - no choice. That's the issue. |
|
sproogle77 |
2009-04-30 |
|
It's quite a good tattoo. Yes, some colour would really lift it. Is it actually legal there to tattoo 14 year olds?!?!? |
|
sproogle77 |
2009-04-30 |
|
Absolutely frigging horrible |
|
sproogle77 |
2009-04-27 |
|
Apart from the fact that there's no such thing as a 'family crest' (in heraldry, a crest can only be held by one individual) it is exceptionally good work. |
|
sproogle77 |
2009-04-14 |
|
I can well picture a nice Strat or Tele running up the length of that arm!! Nice work. |
|
sproogle77 |
2009-04-14 |
|
5 for the tatt, minus 3 for being a wanker. |
|
sproogle77 |
2009-04-13 |
|
How can death watch over you like a guardian angel? Not sure if that makes any sense. Good work though. |
|
sproogle77 |
2009-04-09 |
|
What is it? |
|
sproogle77 |
2009-04-09 |
|
That looks like really, really bad work. |