| Yahoo! News |
| How to recreate body art, Coachella-style |
| Among the style statements inspiring Coachella envy across the web this past weekend were some of the particularly amazing body tattoos and makeup on show. From the whimsical to the geometric, face an |
| 2015-04-14T16:30:06+0000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Celebrity tattoos and the danger of regret |
| What are these illustrated exhibitionists thinking? Lena Dunham’s body is a human canvas, scrawled with seven big and small tattoos, making her resemble a zaftig prison inmate. With an estimated... |
| 2015-04-13T06:22:42+0000 |
|
|
![]() |
Comments made by Kimberly Miller
<-back next->
1 to 15 of 39 comments
 |
Kimberly Miller |
2010-03-05 |
 |
| Absolutely amazing! |
|
Kimberly Miller |
2010-03-05 |
 |
| I love this work. It looks really good and the sentiment of it is great. |
|
Kimberly Miller |
2010-03-05 |
 |
| You are definitely not alone. We learn the hard way, by experience I guess. |
|
Kimberly Miller |
2010-03-05 |
 |
| That looks really cool. I even like that the flames in the background end up looking kinda like horns. She was done very well, love the coloring. |
|
Kimberly Miller |
2010-03-05 |
 |
| This is really nice. I love the colors! Way to rock it for your first tat!! |
|
Kimberly Miller |
2010-03-05 |
 |
| I like this alot. Of course, I'm partial to sparrows. :) I like it in black and grey even though I generally prefer bright and bold colors. Nice work. |
|
Kimberly Miller |
2010-03-05 |
 |
| Very nice!! |
|
Kimberly Miller |
2010-03-05 |
 |
| Very interesting and unique. |
|
Kimberly Miller |
2010-03-05 |
 |
| I love this! Very nice. |
|
Kimberly Miller |
2010-03-05 |
 |
| Very sweet and I think it is perfect. :) |
|
Kimberly Miller |
2010-03-05 |
 |
| Guess it's true you get what you pay for, huh? |
|
Kimberly Miller |
2010-03-05 |
 |
| Nice work. I like it. |
|
Kimberly Miller |
2010-03-05 |
 |
| Very nice work. :) |
|
Kimberly Miller |
2010-03-05 |
 |
| She is very pretty. |
|
Kimberly Miller |
2010-03-05 |
 |
| I love the colors on this. It looks great. |
<-back next->
|
![]() |
|
