| Yahoo! News |
| How to recreate body art, Coachella-style |
| Among the style statements inspiring Coachella envy across the web this past weekend were some of the particularly amazing body tattoos and makeup on show. From the whimsical to the geometric, face an |
| 2015-04-14T16:30:06+0000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Celebrity tattoos and the danger of regret |
| What are these illustrated exhibitionists thinking? Lena Dunham’s body is a human canvas, scrawled with seven big and small tattoos, making her resemble a zaftig prison inmate. With an estimated... |
| 2015-04-13T06:22:42+0000 |
|
|
![]() |
Comments made by StarStruck
<-back next->
31 to 45 of 108 comments
 |
StarStruck |
2005-09-20 |
 |
| Very beautiful ink!! I love that it has meaning to you as well. |
|
StarStruck |
2005-09-10 |
 |
| Love the leopard theme you have going on, but that was sarcastic and I still gave you a 1. |
|
StarStruck |
2005-09-10 |
 |
| Marry me for the woman on my leg, should I be jealous? ;).. thanks for the comment! |
|
StarStruck |
2005-09-05 |
 |
| I love all the bright colors. |
|
StarStruck |
2005-09-05 |
 |
| It does need either more detail, or some color. It has potential. |
|
StarStruck |
2005-09-05 |
 |
| Looks like you better go schedule another cover up session. |
|
StarStruck |
2005-09-05 |
 |
| The orange on top makes it look like it has bangs. |
|
StarStruck |
2005-09-05 |
 |
| That is the best rendering of a tiger I've ever seen. I'd walk around with no shirt on all day if it was on me ;) |
|
StarStruck |
2005-09-05 |
 |
| Very very cool, I love it. |
|
StarStruck |
2005-09-05 |
 |
| For some reason, that is really cute. |
|
StarStruck |
2005-09-05 |
 |
| amazing work! also, thanks for the comment :) |
|
StarStruck |
2005-09-05 |
 |
| Done by Johnny Jackson @ Texas body art Houston, TX. |
|
StarStruck |
2005-09-05 |
|
| my artist for this one is Jeff Ensminger @ Smilin' Ricks in Denton, TX |
|
StarStruck |
2005-08-27 |
 |
| I thought what happened in Vegas, stayed in Vegas.. or should have. |
|
StarStruck |
2005-08-26 |
 |
| Well, I think it's sweet. |
<-back next->
|
![]() |
|
