Yahoo! Answers |
|
|
Open Question: How bad does my tattoo look? |
It's a home tattoo, (big mistake)
I just wanted to know if i over criticize it or it's really shit.
I have others professionally done, this one's getting fixed soon. I just want honest opinions fro |
2013-08-03T06:22:44+0000 |
|
Open Question: How bad does my tattoo look? |
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=izua37&s=5
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2w562vr&s=5
And in my Avi are the only ones where I can find a decent looking shot of it.
It says with hope comes faith, |
2013-08-03T06:18:04+0000 |
|
|
![]() |
Comments made by shane neaves
<-back next->
16 to 23 of 23 comments
 |
shane neaves |
2009-02-24 |
 |
it is the way the pic was taken. it is font from a cpu so can't be bigger. |
 |
shane neaves |
2009-02-23 |
 |
yeah, thanks heaps. you know, some people write shit like they learned how to tattoo perfect overnight. It's not my fault if there are no apprenticeships in my area WILL you dick. But mate, it doesn't mean i don't use viraclean or madicide to prep by area, |
 |
shane neaves |
2009-02-23 |
 |
Does your huby glide the tip or watch the needle? easier to start off gliding the tip with needle not too far out. sometimes on small tats though it's difficult to do this though but worth a shot. |
 |
shane neaves |
2009-02-23 |
 |
Not too bad from what i can see. pics a little blurry. |
 |
shane neaves |
2009-02-23 |
 |
I am only learning myself but if i can say, it looks as if that is his own handwriting. I'm not the best writer so i tend to cheat and stencil something off microsoft word or something. Plenty to choose from at 1001freefonts.com. |
 |
shane neaves |
2009-02-23 |
 |
That's heaps nice man. I love chicano style writing. Can't wait till i can do that stuff. Just practice on paper I guess. Clean as...... |
 |
shane neaves |
2009-02-23 |
 |
Thanks heaps guys. would love you to see my other work too ey, see what you's think. |
 |
shane neaves |
2009-02-22 |
 |
Looks heaps sick man. I reckon it would look much better in colour being where it is, it would always be noticed. Nice work. |
<-back next->
|
![]() |
|