|
squarejane |
2004-08-24 |
|
absolutely stunning. 10 |
|
squarejane |
2004-08-24 |
|
that's freaking tough to pull off...and yet they did. nice. |
|
squarejane |
2004-08-24 |
|
i was thinkin bette middler. *shudder* |
|
squarejane |
2004-08-24 |
|
tattoo is too small for the details, not symmetrical enough and poorly composed. nice color though. |
|
squarejane |
2004-08-24 |
|
cats pyjamas! swell and all, 10. |
|
squarejane |
2004-08-24 |
|
do you want your ego stroked or your tattoos rated? |
|
squarejane |
2004-08-24 |
|
shaddap everyone... talk about the tattoo. like the flames. big black x? not so much. |
|
squarejane |
2004-08-24 |
|
yer ass has nothing to do with your tattoo... maybe more attention on the tattoo and we'd be able to see what it looks like. |
|
squarejane |
2004-08-24 |
|
i'd love to see a closer brighter pic of this cos it looks spectacular! |
|
squarejane |
2004-08-24 |
|
how the hell do people rate here? this is only a 4.4? bullshite! i give 10... cos it blew me away. |
|
squarejane |
2004-08-24 |
|
rootin tootin bees knees cool! a 10! |
|
squarejane |
2004-08-24 |
|
um, get an apprenticeship? |
|
squarejane |
2005-08-25 |
|
"tattie" is white trash... was it done by a "gun"? i think the work might be nice but who can tell by the pic? |
|
squarejane |
2004-08-24 |
|
WHY ARE YOU YELLING? and why so many tattoos of lennon? oh well, the work is quite nice. |
|
squarejane |
2004-08-24 |
|
it's not too much and it's art. lovely. |