| Yahoo! News |
| How to recreate body art, Coachella-style |
| Among the style statements inspiring Coachella envy across the web this past weekend were some of the particularly amazing body tattoos and makeup on show. From the whimsical to the geometric, face an |
| 2015-04-14T16:30:06+0000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Celebrity tattoos and the danger of regret |
| What are these illustrated exhibitionists thinking? Lena Dunham’s body is a human canvas, scrawled with seven big and small tattoos, making her resemble a zaftig prison inmate. With an estimated... |
| 2015-04-13T06:22:42+0000 |
|
|
![]() |
Comments made by Christina
<-back next->
16 to 26 of 26 comments
 |
Christina |
2008-01-03 |
 |
| Oooh I really like it. I love tattoos there. I want one but I know it hurts. |
|
Christina |
2008-01-03 |
 |
| Its nice that you have so much confidence in your relationship. Nice tat. |
|
Christina |
2008-01-03 |
 |
| I would never get a sports teams symbol on me... but the tat is nice, I think it needs coloring in though. |
|
Christina |
2008-01-03 |
 |
| Not a very good picture. Why wouldn't you get her name instead of "Mum" ? |
|
Christina |
2008-01-03 |
 |
| You should take another picture. Looks like it is probably nice. I mean I wouldn't put my name on my body, but thats just a preference of mine. |
|
Christina |
2008-01-03 |
 |
| I'm not crazy about stars but this is a nice tattoo. Nice lettering and the thought behind it is wonderful. |
|
Christina |
2008-01-03 |
 |
| Looks kinda creepy, but I get the feeling thats what you are going for. |
|
Christina |
2008-01-03 |
 |
| Hmm I'd say this was a bad decision. Maybe one day you will realize that. But we all make mistakes, sucks that tattoos are permanent ones. |
|
Christina |
2008-01-03 |
 |
| I like the tattoo, it looks nice. I mean hopefully it isn't for anyone like a Hansen brother..maybe your brother or your son..That would make it better. |
|
Christina |
2008-01-03 |
 |
| Why roo? looks good. |
|
Christina |
2008-01-03 |
 |
| Is it new in this photo? Looks like it hurt, but I like it. |
<-back next->
|
![]() |
|
