| Yahoo! Answers |
|
|
|
|
| Open Question: How bad does my tattoo look? |
|
It's a home tattoo, (big mistake)
I just wanted to know if i over criticize it or it's really shit.
I have others professionally done, this one's getting fixed soon. I just want honest opinions fro |
| 2013-08-03T06:22:44+0000 |
|
| Open Question: How bad does my tattoo look? |
|
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=izua37&s=5
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2w562vr&s=5
And in my Avi are the only ones where I can find a decent looking shot of it.
It says with hope comes faith, |
| 2013-08-03T06:18:04+0000 |
|
|
![]() |
Comments made by king rah "artist"
<-back next->
16 to 26 of 26 comments
 |
king rah "artist" |
2012-03-30 |
 |
| I have this photo of BOB, nose needs to b slightly sharper, but awsome portrait |
|
king rah "artist" |
2012-02-15 |
 |
| assholes will be just that but anyway re post aft heal;shuda took pic b4 ointment its clearer,looks good tho |
|
king rah "artist" |
2012-02-15 |
 |
| to all that have commented 1 is right i am an artist myself and i aspire to b this gud,pavel angel is that dude. it's a style called photo realism i'm gonna post a pic by another russian artist; den switchblade. i'll call 'old woman young child'comment! |
|
king rah "artist" |
2012-01-28 |
 |
| Scarab is slightly crooked but all n all nice Tat |
|
king rah "artist" |
2012-01-28 |
 |
| Beautiful work, love the contrast but id like to c it finish |
|
king rah "artist" |
2012-01-28 |
 |
| First class! FF ink, lovin the skull behind face mask |
|
king rah "artist" |
2012-01-28 |
 |
| wow you shoulda kicked yo artist n tha mouth, did u see it before he did it? if so u need yo ass kicked |
|
king rah "artist" |
2012-01-28 |
 |
| Wtf. A good artist could make that hot,but as is, this is tragic |
|
king rah "artist" |
2012-01-28 |
 |
| Good concept looks unfin tho |
|
king rah "artist" |
2012-01-28 |
 |
| Great detail, this is the alien leg sleeve right |
|
king rah "artist" |
2012-01-28 |
 |
| Lacks depth,cute but u prob shuda let ur artist draw his own based on that design it would prob b more defined |
<-back next->
|
![]() |
|
