| Yahoo! News |
| How to recreate body art, Coachella-style |
| Among the style statements inspiring Coachella envy across the web this past weekend were some of the particularly amazing body tattoos and makeup on show. From the whimsical to the geometric, face an |
| 2015-04-14T16:30:06+0000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Celebrity tattoos and the danger of regret |
| What are these illustrated exhibitionists thinking? Lena Dunham’s body is a human canvas, scrawled with seven big and small tattoos, making her resemble a zaftig prison inmate. With an estimated... |
| 2015-04-13T06:22:42+0000 |
|
|
![]() |
Comments made by dave
<-back next->
1 to 15 of 19 comments
 |
dave |
2004-11-04 |
 |
| Hmmmmmm, I'm not convinced that's actually real! |
|
dave |
2004-11-04 |
 |
| Okay, forget about the placement, it's actually quite a good tat |
|
dave |
2004-11-04 |
 |
| JESUS! I swear if i see one more of these fucking lawnmower tattoos, I'll scream. It's Not funny and it's NOT clever |
|
dave |
2004-10-18 |
 |
| i don't get it! |
|
dave |
2004-07-08 |
 |
| Where's his nose? |
|
dave |
2004-04-15 |
 |
| the title of the pic is "unscarred" - it is therefore showing the tattoo on his stomach |
|
dave |
2004-03-30 |
 |
| nice tattoos - shame about the manky toes!!!! |
|
dave |
2004-03-30 |
 |
| ? |
|
dave |
2004-03-30 |
 |
| I think I know this person - if I'm right, it's an english tattooist called Skip. He's a great tattooist and a great guy. |
|
dave |
2004-03-30 |
 |
| WOW! What a truley amazing tattoo. This is exactly what tattooing is about - art. And this really is a work of art. |
|
dave |
2004-03-26 |
 |
| Stunning tattoo. Shame the pic isn't completely focused on it. |
|
dave |
2004-03-26 |
 |
| Lovely tatt. Beautiful colours. The fan actually looks real! |
|
dave |
2004-03-26 |
 |
| Nice tatt and great colours, but the tiger looks a bit out of proportion somehow. Anyone else think this? |
|
dave |
2004-03-26 |
|
| I hate this lawnmower shit! It's not funny and it's not original! |
|
dave |
2004-03-26 |
 |
| If 6 year olds could tattoo, this is the sort of thing they would come up with! Sorry! |
<-back next->
|
![]() |
|
