| Yahoo! News |
| How to recreate body art, Coachella-style |
| Among the style statements inspiring Coachella envy across the web this past weekend were some of the particularly amazing body tattoos and makeup on show. From the whimsical to the geometric, face an |
| 2015-04-14T16:30:06+0000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Celebrity tattoos and the danger of regret |
| What are these illustrated exhibitionists thinking? Lena Dunham’s body is a human canvas, scrawled with seven big and small tattoos, making her resemble a zaftig prison inmate. With an estimated... |
| 2015-04-13T06:22:42+0000 |
|
|
![]() |
Comments made by pntbllnmchnst
<-back next->
1 to 15 of 16 comments
 |
pntbllnmchnst |
2003-10-01 |
 |
| waiting for the beep indicating a page turn |
|
pntbllnmchnst |
2003-04-30 |
 |
| 10 for humor |
|
pntbllnmchnst |
2003-04-30 |
 |
| looks like they're at prom, i'd say they're both stick ons, pretty sad too, her arms look bigger than his |
|
pntbllnmchnst |
2003-04-10 |
 |
| looks like a wolf body with a panthers head |
|
pntbllnmchnst |
2003-04-09 |
 |
| ive seen little kids color in the lines better than this one |
|
pntbllnmchnst |
2003-04-09 |
|
| rachel, not to get down on you, but if thats the nicest tat youve ever seen, WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?? |
|
pntbllnmchnst |
2003-04-09 |
 |
| i think i just wet myself, oh wait, nope, knocked over my water glass |
|
pntbllnmchnst |
2003-04-09 |
 |
| need to weed that flower garden!!! |
|
pntbllnmchnst |
2003-04-09 |
 |
| i dont see hearts in there any where?! |
|
pntbllnmchnst |
2003-04-09 |
 |
| i dont have that tat and my grandmothers dont either |
|
pntbllnmchnst |
2003-04-09 |
 |
| looks like it might need a little re coloring, but it still looks good |
|
pntbllnmchnst |
2003-04-09 |
 |
| she would have been a LOT sexier in a thong, bloomers just dont do it for me |
|
pntbllnmchnst |
2003-04-04 |
 |
| looks good as much as i can see, but a little fuzzy, are you able to fix that? |
|
pntbllnmchnst |
2003-04-04 |
 |
| do you.... |
|
pntbllnmchnst |
2003-04-04 |
 |
| by the way how far down does that go? |
<-back next->
|
![]() |
|
